Hadwiger–Nelson: is the chromatic number of the Euclidean plane 6 or 7?
Difficulty 79: eighty years old; the lower bound moved in 2018 (5) and in 2026 (6, by an unrefereed but Lean-checked preprint), while the upper bound 7 has not moved since 1950. The remaining 6-versus-7 question has no credible route: the 2026 obstruction is built for five colours, no 6-colouring of the plane is known, and no explicit graph even needing 6 colours is known. It sits level with diagonal Ramsey (78) and below abc (85), and far above the finite Erdős–Szekeres n = 7 case (45), which is a bounded computation. Application value 2.2: none beyond SAT and formal-proof methodology. Leverage 27: the SAT, minimisation and measurable-colouring toolkits are reused, but few results are conditional on the answer, comparable to r(4,t) (25).
The problem
How many colours does the plane need so points one apart never match? Six or seven; nobody knows which.
- 1Colour the plane, points 1 apart differ
- 27 colours suffice via hexagons
- 3In 2018, 4 colours shown too few
- 4In 2026, 5 colours shown too few
- 5Is 6 enough? Still unknown
Setup. Let be the on : two points are adjacent iff their Euclidean distance is exactly . Its chromatic number is the least such that the plane can be coloured with colours with no two points at distance sharing a colour. By the (assuming the axiom of choice), equals the maximum chromatic number of a unit-distance graph. The current bounds are , with the lower bound resting on a 2026 preprint (below). decide whether is or .
Path to understanding
foundations → problemThe research entries this problem rests on, in the order to read them. Each links to its explainer.
- Start with
- Step 2
- Step 3
- SAT solving (CDCL)Algorithm
- Step 4
- Extremal and probabilistic combinatoricsTheory · host
- Then
- Hadwiger–Nelson: is the chromatic number of the Euclidean plane 6 or 7?The problem
State of the art
The upper bound 7 comes from colouring a hexagonal tiling with hexagons of diameter slightly below 1 (Isbell, 1950). The lower bound 4 was known from 1950; the Moser spindle (W. and L. Moser, 1961) and the Golomb graph are the standard 4-chromatic witnesses. In April 2018 de Grey exhibited a 1581-vertex unit-distance graph that is not 4-colourable, proving with SAT-solver verification; Exoo and Ismailescu gave an independent proof. Polymath16 and Heule then shrank the witness (Heule: 553 vertices, arXiv:1805.12181), and the smallest known 5-chromatic unit-distance graph has 509 vertices (Parts, Geombinatorics 29(4), 2020; the bound is restated by de Grey and Parts, arXiv:2303.14714). The preprint "The Euclidean plane is not five-colorable" (OpenAI, dated 23 September 2026, released in the openai/math repository in October 2026; produced by an internal OpenAI model; unrefereed) proves that every 5-colouring of the plane has a monochromatic unit-distance pair, with no regularity assumption on the colour classes, so . The proof is not a finite-graph certificate: it transfers any proper -colouring to a "weak measurable" -colouring (monochromatic unit pairs of measure zero), for every , and then excludes weak measurable 5-colourings by circle averages, Fourier decay of the circle measure and a topological argument. A finite non-5-colourable unit-distance graph therefore exists by compactness, but none is known explicitly. The Lean 4 proof (, standard axioms only) is public; Formal Conjectures marks solved with a link to it, and an independent third-party audit (13 October 2026) rebuilt it against a Mathlib-only restatement and accepted it with Comparator and the independent nanoda kernel. The same audit found that OpenAI's published Comparator configuration leaves the colouring definition unchecked; the definition itself is correct. Related variants: the fractional chromatic number of the plane is at least 4 (Matolcsi, Ruzsa, Varga, Zsámboki, arXiv:2311.10069, v4 March 2025, preprint), and Voronov proved that the plane with a small interval of forbidden distances needs at least 7 colours (arXiv:2304.10163, preprint, v3 April 2025), confirming a conjecture of Exoo. Another 2026 construction is a 2131-vertex 5-chromatic graph that avoids the Moser spindle (Haugland, arXiv:2608.04542, preprint), which is not a size record. No 6-colouring of the plane and no proof that 7 colours are needed is known; the question 6 versus 7 is open as of 2026-10-17.
Realistic applications
None practical. The problem is a testbed for SAT-assisted combinatorial geometry and graph minimisation techniques; the methods transfer to other finite-search-with-certificate problems.
What counts as solved
Either (a) a proof that the plane has no proper 6-colouring, giving : for example an explicit finite unit-distance graph with a machine-checkable certificate of non-6-colourability (such as a DRAT/LRAT proof checked by a verified checker), or a formal proof; or (b) an explicit 6-colouring of the plane with no monochromatic unit-distance pair, with a proof, giving . Either result, accepted by experts, resolves the problem. Both rely on the 2026 lower bound being upheld; if that proof failed, the question would revert to whether .
How it gets verified
Bound / recordA numeric bound or record checked from a certificate or recomputation.
Quantity: the chromatic number of the plane, χ(ℝ²). The bounds 5 ≤ χ ≤ 7 are classical; χ ≥ 6 is claimed with a Lean proof (below), leaving 6 versus 7 open. The Lean statements are in ErdosProblems/508.lean (Formal Conjectures pinned at commit e754a78 (17 October 2026); the Wikipedia/HadwigerNelson.lean file points there): the open target is Erdos508.HadwigerNelsonProblem (χ(ℝ²) = answer), and Erdos508.HadwigerNelsonAtLeastSix : 6 ≤ χ(ℝ²) is labelled solved, linking the Lean proof OAI.EuclideanFiveColor.no_proper_five_coloring from OpenAI's September 2026 preprint "The Euclidean plane is not five-colorable" (unrefereed). That proof is stated for colourings of ℂ and is analytic, so it yields no finite graph. Verifying it means building it against its pinned Mathlib, confirming with Comparator that only standard axioms are used with the ProperColoring definition checked rather than left as a definition hole, and proving the transport to FC's UnitDistancePlaneGraph on EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin 2). Settling 6 versus 7: χ = 7 is certified by a finite unit-distance graph that is not 6-colourable (by de Bruijn–Erdős), checked by a verified SAT checker or in Lean, or by a formal proof that no proper 6-colouring exists; χ = 6 needs an explicit 6-colouring of the plane with a proof.
Claims under verification
+ add a claimWhere the work is
With χ ≥ 6 proved in 2026 by an analytic argument rather than a finite graph, the open question is 6 versus 7: proving χ = 7 needs a non-6-colourable unit-distance graph (a structured search needing new geometric ideas) or an extension of the analytic method to six colours; proving χ = 6 needs a new colouring of the plane.
Bottlenecks
ranked by votes- #1TheoryNo route yet to a seventh colour
The 2026 five-colour obstruction transfers arbitrary colourings to weak measurable ones for any number of colours, but its geometric exclusion step is specific to five labels and is not known to extend to six. Finite constructions from small rigid gadgets such as the Moser spindle have not produced even an explicit 6-chromatic graph.
Community grades
Sign in to add your own grade.
Connected problems
Progress
- Oct 13, 2026Independent audit accepts the Lean proof of χ(ℝ²) ≥ 6source
A third-party audit restates the theorem in a Mathlib-only file and checks the proof with the Lean kernel, Comparator and the independent nanoda kernel (standard axioms only). It also flags that OpenAI's own Comparator configuration leaves the colouring definition unchecked.
- Sep 23, 2026Plane shown not 5-colourable: χ(ℝ²) ≥ 6 (unrefereed preprint, Lean proof)source
An OpenAI preprint, produced by an internal OpenAI model, proves that every 5-colouring of the plane has a monochromatic unit-distance pair, by a measure-theoretic and topological argument rather than a finite graph. It ships a Lean 4 proof, so 6 ≤ χ(ℝ²) ≤ 7. Released in October 2026; not refereed.
- Mar 27, 2025Fractional chromatic number of the plane at least 4 (preprint revision)source
Latest revision of the Matolcsi et al. preprint on the fractional relaxation.
- May 30, 2018553-vertex 5-chromatic graph