Quantum PCP: constant-relative-gap k-local Hamiltonian is QMA-hard (NLTS now proved; qLTCs open)
Difficulty 83: the defining open problem of quantum Hamiltonian complexity; NLTS (2022) and almost-good qLTCs (2024) are necessary-condition progress, but there is no quantum gap-amplification technique and some instance families are provably easier, so it sits just above ω (82) and below SETH (88). Application value 8: no near-term use beyond hardness of approximating ground energies. Leverage 55: it organises quantum Hamiltonian complexity and connects to quantum codes, comparable to Hodge (58) in the size of its dependent literature.
The problem
Is it hard even for quantum computers to estimate the lowest energy of a quantum system to a modest accuracy?
- 1Ground energy of quantum systems is hard
- 2Classical PCP: crude answers also hard
- 3Quantum PCP: same for quantum systems?
- 4Weak part (NLTS) proved in 2022
- 5Full conjecture still open
Local Hamiltonian problem. Let be a -local Hamiltonian on qudits: a sum of terms, each acting on at most particles, with . The problem asks whether the ground energy is at most or at least . Kitaev showed that it is QMA-complete for . (QMA is the quantum analogue of NP: problems whose yes answers have a quantum proof checkable by a quantum computer.)
Path to understanding
foundations → problemThe research entries this problem rests on, in the order to read them. Each links to its explainer.
- Start with
- Step 2
- Step 3
- Quantum algorithmsAlgorithm · host
- Then
- Quantum PCP: constant-relative-gap k-local Hamiltonian is QMA-hard (NLTS now proved; qLTCs open)The problem
State of the art
Necessary conditions. The No Low-energy Trivial States (NLTS) conjecture of Freedman and Hastings (2014), a necessary consequence of qPCP, was proved by Anshu, Breuckmann and Nirkhe (arXiv:2206.13228, 2022; STOC 2023), using the good quantum LDPC codes of Panteleev and Kalachev (arXiv:2111.03654, 2021): there are local Hamiltonians for which every state of energy requires circuits of super-constant depth. NLTS is much weaker than qPCP, since low-energy states may still be efficiently verifiable.
Further evidence and obstructions. Brandão and Harrow (STOC 2013) showed that product states approximate the ground energy of Hamiltonians on dense or high-degree graphs well, so qPCP cannot hold for such instances. Eldar and Harrow (arXiv:1510.02082, FOCS 2017) introduced and proved the weaker NLETS property (no low-error trivial states) for Hamiltonians whose ground states are hard to approximate by shallow circuits. Quantum locally testable codes (qLTCs) are a natural route to qPCP. Cross, He, Natarajan, Szegedy and Zhu (arXiv:2209.11405; Quantum 2024) built qLTCs with constant soundness but weak distance; Dinur, Lin and Vidick (arXiv:2402.07476, 2024) built almost-good qLTCs with constant rate and inverse-polylogarithmic distance and soundness; and Bafna, Li and Nguyen (arXiv:2609.26735, ECCC TR26-204, September 2026, preprint) construct qLTCs with constant rate, distance, soundness and locality assuming a variant of a Reed–Solomon product-expansion conjecture. Even good qLTCs are not known to imply qPCP. Gap-amplification routes in the style of Dinur's classical PCP proof have not been found. As of October 2026 no resolution or credible claim was found, including in the October 2026 OpenAI manuscript list.
Realistic applications
A proof would give hardness of approximation for ground-state energies of local Hamiltonians and a quantum analogue of the PCP theorem, with consequences for the entanglement structure of low-energy states (NLTS, already proved, is the first of these). A refutation would yield new constant-factor approximation algorithms for ground energies. There are no near-term applications.
What counts as solved
A proof of QMA-hardness of the -local Hamiltonian problem with relative promise gap for some constant and , or a proof that this promise problem lies in a class below QMA (for example NP or MA), or an unconditional proof that it cannot be QMA-hard under reductions of the standard types. Partial progress: constructing qLTCs with constant rate, distance and soundness.
How it gets verified
Expert reviewOnly expert review of the argument is possible today.
The statement is QMA-hardness of the k-local Hamiltonian problem with a constant relative promise gap, or a proof that the problem lies in a lower class. Mathlib has no quantum complexity classes, so experts review any proof. Constructing quantum locally testable codes with constant rate, distance and soundness would be partial progress, and each such construction can be checked by explicit computation on small instances.
Claims under verification
+ add a claimNo claimed results on the Verification board for this problem yet.
Where the work is
Complexity-theoretic proof; there are no experiments and no computational shortcuts.
Bottlenecks
ranked by votes- #1TheoryNo quantum gap-amplification technique
Dinur-style amplification uses expander graphs and composition that rely on copying classical assignments; quantum states cannot be copied, so each step needs a new idea.
Community grades
Sign in to add your own grade.
Connected problems
Progress
- Sep 22, 2026Conditional good qLTCs (preprint)source
Bafna, Li and Nguyen constructed qLTCs with constant rate, distance and soundness under a Reed–Solomon product-expansion conjecture. Not refereed.
- Jun 27, 2022NLTS provedsource
Anshu, Breuckmann and Nirkhe proved the NLTS conjecture (STOC 2023).
- Nov 1, 2021Good quantum LDPC codessource
Panteleev and Kalachev constructed asymptotically good quantum LDPC codes.
- Jan 7, 2013NLTS conjecturesource
Freedman and Hastings posed the NLTS conjecture as a necessary consequence of qPCP (arXiv January 2013, QIC 2014; day approximate).